Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Characteristics of a new cone beam computed tomography

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 37±Ç 4È£ p.205 ~ 209
¹Úâ¼­, ±è±â´ö, ¹ÚÇõ, Á¤È£°É, ÀÌ»óö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Úâ¼­ ( Park Chang-Se ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
±è±â´ö ( Kim Kee-Deog ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
¹ÚÇõ ( Park Hyok ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
Á¤È£°É ( Jeong Ho-Gul ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óö ( Lee Sang-Chul ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose : To determine the physical properties of a newly developed cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials & Methods : We measured and compared the imaging properties for the indirect-type flat panel
detector (FPD) of a new CBCT and the single detector array (SDA) of conventional helical CT (CHCT).

Results : First, the modulation transfer function (MTF) of the CBCT were superior to those of the CHCT. Second,
the noise power spectrum (NPS) of the CBCT were worse than those of the CHCT. Third, detective quantum
efficiency (DQE) of the indirect-type CBCT were worse than those of the CHCT at lower spatial frequencies, but
were better at higher spatial frequencies. Although the comparison of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was estimated in the limited range of tube current, CNR of CBCT were worse than those of CHCT.

Conclusion : This study shows that the indirect-type FPD system may be useful as a CBCT detector because of
high resolution.

Å°¿öµå

Tomography; Cone Beam Computed; Flat panel; MTF; NPS; DQE; SNR

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed